In the previous installment of this series, we concluded
with a discussion of the madrigal and how it, in some ways, was the best
example of Renaissance style. The very end of the Renaissance, however, brought
about some very interesting developments. As history continued to march on,
with political, social and religious change, music was right there in the
middle of it. There were two topics I was hoping to cover today, but as I wrote
the body of the article, I realized that they are each so important to the
history and development of music as we know it, that they deserve their own
posts. Today, we’ll look at the music of the Reformation and
Counter-reformation, the influential composers of this phenomenon, and how sacred
music had to some extent come full circle. The second idea, which we’ll explore
in a couple weeks—is how secular composers followed the trends of the other
arts—visual and language arts—by showing extreme mannerism in their styles.
The Reformation, as nearly anybody would tell you, began in
1517 when Martin Luther nailed his ninety-five theses to the door of Wittenberg
Chapel in Germany. If I were to give you the whole backstory leading up to this
event, I’d need to start a whole new series. Suffice it to say that Luther and
several others began to realize that the one of the reasons the Catholic Church
held such a strong cultural hold on the people was the fact that few people any
more actually knew what was being taught. All the services—those beautiful
masses that we’ve discussed—were in Latin. Any sermons, any scriptures—all Latin.
With the spread of the Church across Europe, the large majority of the people
who worshiped in the church could not understand a word of what they were
told. And if you don’t understand it, you can’t refute it. This allowed
corruption and extortion to creep in, and the common parishioner was none the
wiser.
In order to combat this corruption, Luther broke away from
the Church, translated the scriptures and services into the vernacular, and
started teaching the average villager how to understand for himself. He did
write a German mass, but he also began to compose and teach simple chorales (a
vernacular version of the Latin motet). These were intended for congregation
singing, and home devotions, bringing sacred music out of the choir loft and to
the people. The texts and melodies were either adaptations of Latin chant, or
newly composed by Luther and others in the movement.
John Calvin and his reformation in Switzerland and France
produced a generous collection of accessible Psalm settings, and the English
quickly followed suit. They dropped the mass all together in favor of a simpler
service with anthems in English. There were elaborate versions for trained
choirs and special occasions, but the large bulk of the music was sung by the
congregation, and required little training. Because music was such a part of
devotion for these people, it was the religious reformers that did much of the
writing and composing of new pieces for worship. Many of these have become the
modern hymns of the Protestant Church.
The other half of this coin is the counter-reformation, or
the religious reformation accomplished from within the Catholic Church rather
than by breaking away from it. With so much upheaval, the Church leaders
realized that things weren’t running as they should, and that it was time to
re-evaluate. And here we come to the composer that many consider to be the
perfection of Renaissance counterpoint.
Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina was born in the 1520’s and
lived to the end of the century, working at St. Peter’s Basilica for much of
his life. He fine-tuned his counterpoint with such finesse that his sound is
like none other. Some of the qualities seen in his work include scoring for 4-6
voices but with each voice utilizing only a very tight-range, eliminating voice
crossing. His use of consonance and dissonance was very delicate, with enough dissonance
to create a satisfying resolution but keeping the imperfect consonances on the
strong beats. This practice went a long way in training the public to hear
pieces in either the major or minor keys, leaving behind some of the earlier
modes. His rhythm flows easily, not obscuring the text, but emphasizing it. One
other strong characteristic includes the elimination of parallel fifths and
octaves. Any theory student will have been beaten over the head with this rule,
but listening to the full, rich sound of Palestrina’s compositions proves the
point.
His most famous piece, the Pope Marcellus Mass, has because
the stuff of legend. It is said that during the Council of Trent—a meeting of
church leaders to discuss reforms—nearly banned polyphonic music from the
church, citing the focus on elaborate production rather than the text.
According to the story, it was Palestrina’s mass that convinced the council
that polyphonic music could be uplifting and sacred, not distracting. Listen to
it for a minute--or 30--and you’ll see why the Council was so affected by this piece
of genius.
He had contemporaries that pushed his rules somewhat. Tomas
Luis deVictoria is a Spanish composer who brought an exotic flair to sacred
composition without obscuring its use for worship. He was one of the first to
being using chromatics (sharps or flats not included in the key) as a way of
emphasizing words or intensifying cadences.
And so we see how sacred music began with very simple,
text-based compositions intended only to enhance the devotion of the participant.
Slowly, the various chants and services became more elaborate as artists
explored the possibilities of this new medium. In time, church authorities felt that the meaning of the text
was being lost, and the complex sacred motets of the early Renaissance
were becoming useless for worship. Now here at the end of the Renaissance, the
church—both Catholic and Protestant—has found a way to maintain the beauty and
complexity of its music without losing the original purpose.
Next post, we'll look at the craziness that was the end of the Renaissance in the world of secular music, and how it paved the way for the Baroque era of Monteverdi, Corelli, Handel and Bach.
Well, you know, complicated music and unintelligible words aren't necessarily useless for worship. That is really a matter of opinion. (And it ain't my opinion!)
ReplyDeleteVery good point! I should have made it clearer that I was simply stating the historical viewpoints of those responsible for making decisions on music in the church (i.e. the Council of Trent or Martin Luther). Actually, I think I'm going to edit the article appropriately. Thanks for the comment! What do you think of the rest of the series?
Delete